The most heinous of crimes are subject to the highest form of punishment — death penalty.
Arguments against the Death Penalty You are here: Arguments against the Death… The idea of putting another human to death is hard to completely fathom. The physical mechanics involved in the act of execution are easy to grasp, but the emotions involved in carrying out a death sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is beyond my own understanding.
However, this act is sometimes necessary and it is our responsibility as a society to see that it is done. Opponents of capital punishment have basically four arguments. The first is that there is a possibility of error.
However, the chance that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the death penalty can be justified or not. If an error does occur, and an innocent person is executed, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. Furthermore, most activities in our world, in which humans are involved, possess a possibility of injury or death.
Construction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility of accidental death even though the highest levels of precautions are taken. These activities continue to take place, and continue to occasionally take human lives, because we have all decided, as a society, that the advantages outweigh the unintended loss.
We have also decided that the advantages of having dangerous murderers removed from our society outweigh the losses of the offender.
The second argument against capital punishment is that it is unfair in its administration. Statistics show that the poor and minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty.
Once again, this is a separate issue. However, this is yet another problem of our current court system. The racial and economic bias is not a valid argument against the death penalty.
It is an argument against the courts and their unfair system of sentencing. The third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some supporters of the death penalty. The claim is that the threat of capital punishment reduces violent crimes.
It is both cruel and costly. This is the least credible argument against capital punishment. The main cause of such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end.
If supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. As for the additional argument, that making a prisoner wait for years to be executed is cruel, then would not waiting for death in prison for the rest of your life be just as cruel, as in the case of life imprisonment without parole.
Many Americans will tell you why they are in favor of the death penalty. It is what they deserve. It prevents them from ever murdering again. It removes the burden from taxpayers. We all live in a society with the same basic rights and guarantees. We have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness with equal opportunities.
This is the basis for our society. It is the foundation on which everything else is built upon. When someone willfully and flagrantly attacks this foundation by murdering another, robbing them of all they are, and all they will ever be, then that person can no longer be a part of this society.
The only method that completely separates cold blooded murderers from our society is the death penalty. As the 20th century comes to a close, it is evident that our justice system is in need of reform.
This reform will shape the future of our country, and we cannot jump to quick solutions such as the elimination of the death penalty.
As of now, the majority of American supports the death penalty as an effective solution of punishment. Why not execute them and save society the cost of their keep? However, it seems obvious to some Americans that the death penalty is a just and proper way to handle convicted murderers.According to Hugo A.
Bedau, the writer of “The Death Penalty in America”, capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty.
The death penalty has . For And Against Capital Punishment Philosophy Essay. Print Reference this. Published: 23rd March, Often the debates over these justifications become as heated as the debates over the death penalty itself.
One common source of disagreement between those supporting and those opposing the death penalty is whether the death penalty really acts. The Death Penalty: Just or Fairly? Edmond Dowling Jr. PHI Instructor Kelly Mink October 10, Is the Death Penalty just and applied fairly?
Outline Introduction Capital Punishment is viewed as a political viewpoint that has pro’s and con’s by the American people. Free Essay: The Death Penalty - Just Punishment for Murder Essay has Problems with Format The death penalty has always been and continues to be a very.
The title is Arguments against the Death Penalty yet the author spent the whole time counterclaiming any arguments brought up rather than explaining the logistics behind the arguments.
No side was taken in this essay however the title clearly states that the essay should be on arguments against. Essay Capital Punishment And The Death Penalty In , the first use of capital punishment was recorded in the colonies, which started debates that have lasted centuries.
In the following years, the use of the death penalty was common and the numbers of people executed skyrocketed.